orcad原理图与power pcb LAYOUT的同步说明

vc++的书籍源码用于图象处理方面的研究，-vc++ source books used for image processing research,

MFC实例关于界面的东西很多-MFC interface examples of a lot of things

本书介绍了在Microsoft Windows 98、Microsoft Windows NT 4.0和Windows NT 5.0下程序写作的方法。这些程序用C语言编写并使用原始的Windows Application Programming Interface（API）。如在本章稍后所讨论的，这不是写作Windows程序的唯一方法。然而，无论最终您使用什么方式写作程序，了解Windows API都是非常重要的。-book on the Microsoft Windows 98, Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 and Windows NT 5.0 under the procedures Writing Methods. These procedures using C language and the use of the original Windows Application Progra mming Interface (API). If later in this chapter under discussion, and it is not writing Windows process the only way. However, no matter what the ultimate way to use your writing process, learn about the Windows API is very important.

在c++矩阵和向量的运用-in the matrix and vector use

现代通信系统书第二章程序（电子工业出版社）-Modern communications systems book chapter2 procedures (Electronics Industry Press)

ASM 的教程。 这是使用 win32asm进行数据库编程，进行WINDOWS界面编程， Win32ASM的编译器最常用的有两种：Borland公司的Tasm5.0和Microsoft的Masm6.11以上版本，两种编译器各有自己的优缺点，Tasm带了一个不大不小的Import库，而Masm没有带，但Masm在代码的优化上面好象比Tasm做得好，但它却不带Import库。看来使用哪一种编译器还是比较难选择的，但Steve Hutchesson给了我们一个答案，他为Masm建立了一个很全的Import库，基本上包括了Windows绝大部分的Api函数，这些库、include文件和其他工具还有Masm6.14版本一起做成了一个 Masm32编译器 -- Masm32V5。这样一来，我们用汇编编程就象用C一样方便。 因为有了Masm32V5，所以就我个人而言，我推荐使用Masm作为Win32ASM的编译工具，但Masm和Tasm的宏语法有很多的不同，我的这个教程是以Masm格式写的。-err

softIce is a good tool for windows to debug . This is a book which introduce many commond and teach us how to us the commonds in softice-softIce is a good tool for windows to debug. This is a book which introduce many commond and t each us how to us the commonds in softice

介绍java nio的书，找了半天才找到的。 非常好看，实用！- Introduced java nio the book, looked for half talent to find. Extremely attractive, practical!

C语言编程100题，适合初学C语言的朋友认真研究-C language programming 100 questions, suitable for novice C language friends carefully studied

As the Hardware Description Language (HDL) enhancement activities have increased over the past year, so too has the complexity in determining which language(s) are the best tools for designers and organizations to continue using or to adopt. Many designers and organizations are contemplating whether they should switch from one HDL to another.